Are You on your way to be a Millionaire - Will you get there before me? Q and A

  Yes. going to give away a lot before a billion. this depends on if you help more people before me, and ROI. You have to find more people, communicate more and fill their needs faster. My newest technique. new business books on amazon.com FREE every 2 hrs to 2 days! trying to skim in implement 1 a day!! you have at least 90% to much stuff! you can give me your closet stuff. Today is someday. Appl APPLE up 29% this year! going to $1000. I sent you a referral to optionshouse.com there is a FREE kindle book on options. if you understand it you can teach me. Watch my playlist on www.youtube.com/user/b29349 clean. Get everything you haven't seen in a month - GONE. You won't use it or miss it, because you already haven't. My videos free up your neurons so you will become smarter = more brain power! We didn't a Billionaire childhood to "train" in, some day is NOW. " You can always top yourself every time." This is not something I can do for you, but I'm giving you the best tools I have.
Take small risks to find a need to eliminate everyday. The experience of having taken small risks are more valuable than saving the spent money. Pay your daily adventure tuition. Pierce your box. The Best Brother Ever.

"Look Out" Shoplifter Walmart South Carolina ReTRIAL

My question involves criminal law for State of  South Carolina Walmart Shoplifting

Retrain Asset Protection and Correct. FALSE SHOPLIFTING, Everyday. young girl, did not attempt to be a "look out " for the other 3 female shop lifters at Wal-mart. This is what she did through my Thursday night Dream Casting - 1. She did what any innocent,shocked, startled person would do; Panicked. The same pattern erratic movements is what a mouse does in a maze when it doesn't know what to do. 2. She fled the group, but kept looking and returning to the group. B) She was Not being a "look out" for many reasons. 1.We the jury could not see her face or view her body language, but 2. Any basic threatening combat ( potentially threatening ) situation a "look out" would not kept a large bag on their shoulder restricting movement and speed. 3. Also, it would have been used to load more stolen items. 4. Several minutes had passed during the commission of this crime. C) under the hand of one hand of all - the officer would have had to 1. prove conspiracy - that the "Lookout" was reasonably going to benefit from the theft - materially or momentarily which did NOT display in the law or even attempt to do verbally, Showing Police malicious, misconduct by misrepresenting the law that we the jury were never allowed to see. 2. Under the instruction of the law the officer implied, He would have to had arrested the other passersby that stopped within a few feet of the 3 female robbers as well, in clear-view of the stuffing of bras. 3. We were instructed to apply the law, but not provided a copy of it. There are 50 different shoplifting laws in each state.D) A time stamp was not on the 3 video recordings. 1. Several minutes passed during the commission of the crime by the other 3 women. 2. It is not reasonable to assume a shocked young girl is going to a) even attempt to prevent her peer group instantly, from stealing. b) flee the store, Wal - mart, when she was driven their by them -thieves of no. E) the officer, "sees these all the time"; every person he arrests is automatically - guilty. We the jury had you do nothing more than, cause you to punish an person that was protecting themselves in best they could in a threatening situation. The Wrongfully Convicted - DID NOT MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO FACILITATE THIS CRIME.
Ways to improve chances of a fair trail - 1. Have the suspect stand closer to the jury than the officer. 2. A) Provide Internet access and B) a paper copy of all laws in the jury room under consideration. 3. A timer.
This was a brave young woman and I along with the system felled to protect her. The arresting officer needs to be retrained.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel - The accused, nor the jury had counsel.

attorney’s behavior might appear inadequate, at best.

Police and/or Process Misconduct - The Officer misrepresented the 2 laws, applied - shoplifting, "look out", hand of one is the hand of all.
police officer has lied or exaggerated his testimony during a criminal trial WHAT CAN BE DONE TO CORRECT THE CONVICTION? RETRIAL? APPEAL? EXPUNGE? RETRAIN POLICE? FINE WALMART - ASSET PROTECTION? CHANGE LAWS? COSTS?   

Letter to Walmart.com Corporation Wrongful Shoplifting Jury Wrongful Conviction

Retrain Asset Protection and Correct. FALSE SHOPLIFTING, Every day. Judge McJimpsey, young girl Monday 13 Feb did not attempt to be a "lookout "  for the other 3 female shoplifters at WalMart. This is what she did through my Thursday night Dream Casting - 1. She did what any innocent, shocked, startled person would do; Panicked. The same pattern erratic movements is what a mouse does in a maze when it doesn't know what to do. 2. She fled the group but kept looking and returning to the group.  B) She was Not being a "look out" for many reasons.  1. We the jury could not see her face or view her body language, but 2. Any basic threatening combat ( potentially threatening ) situation a "lookout" would not keep a large bag on their shoulder restricting movement and speed.  3. Also, it would have been used to load more stolen items. 4. Several minutes had passed during the commission of this crime. C) under the hand of one hand of all - the officer would have had to 1. prove conspiracy - that the "Lookout" was reasonably going to benefit from the theft - materially or momentarily which did NOT display in the law or even attempt to do verbally, Showing Police malicious, misconduct by misrepresenting the law that we the jury were never allowed to see. 2. Under the instruction of the law, the officer implied, He would have to have arrested the other passersby that stopped within a few feet of the 3 female robbers as well, in clear view of the stuffing of bras.  3. We were instructed to apply the law, but not provided a copy of it. There are 50 different shoplifting laws in each state.D) A time stamp was not on the 3 video recordings. 1. Several minutes passed during the commission of the crime by the other 3 women. 2. It is not reasonable to assume a shocked young girl is going to a) even attempt to prevent her peer group instantly, from stealing. b) flee the store, Walmart, when she was driven there by them -thieves of no.  E) the officer, "sees these all the time"; every person he arrests is automatically - guilty.    We the jury had you do nothing more than, cause you to punish a person that was protecting themselves in best they could in a threatening situation.  The Wrongfully Convicted - DID NOT MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO FACILITATE THIS CRIME.
Ways to improve chances of a fair trial - 1. Have the suspect stand closer to the jury that the officer. 2. A) Provide Internet access and B) a paper copy of all laws in the jury room under consideration.  3. A timer.
This was a brave young woman and me along with the system felled to protect her. The arresting officer needs to be retrained.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel  -    The accused nor us the jury had no counsel.

attorney’s behavior might appear inadequate, at best.

Police and/or Process Misconduct  - The Officer misrepresented the 2 laws,  we the jury were to apply.
 the police officer has lied or exaggerated his testimony during a criminal trial.  www.garnerrape.blogspot.com www.victimarrested.blogspot.com www.sexmisconduct.blogspot.com

WalMart FALSE ARREST shoplifting conviction Judge McJimpsey wmt walmart.com Black female age 17 Dorman Center Spartanburg

Please sign https://www.change.org/p/vincent-sheheen-wrongful-shoplifting-arrest-walmart Judge McJimpsey

Erika McJimpsey

Judge
(864) 596-2038

City of Spartanburg

Municipal Court

P.O. Drawer 1749

Spartanburg, S.C. 29304

  The young girl Monday 13 Feb 2012 Case, Walmart Dorman Center Spartanburg, South Carolina; did not attempt to be a "look out " for the other 3 female shop lifters at Wal-Mart. This is what she did through my Thursday night Dream Casting 1. She ( Black Female 17, looks 12) did what any innocent, shocked ( see erratic rat swimming in water maze; No platform - YouTube video) startled person would do; Panicked! The same pattern erratic movements is what a mouse does in a maze when it doesn't know what to do. 2. She fled the group, but kept looking and returning to the group. B) She was Not being a "look out" for many reasons - 1.We the jury could not see her face or view her body language, but 2. Any basic threatening combat ( potentially threatening ) situation a "look out" would not kept a large bag on their shoulder restricting movement and speed. 3. Also, it would have been used to load more stolen items. 4. Several minutes had passed during the commission of this crime. C) under the hand of one hand of all - the officer would have had to 1. prove conspiracy - that the "Lookout" was reasonably going to benefit from the theft - materially or momentarily which did NOT display in the law or even attempt to do verbally, Showing Police malicious, misconduct by misrepresenting the law that we the jury were never allowed to see. 2. Under the instruction of the law the officer implied, He would have to had arrested the other passersby that stopped within a few feet of the 3 female robbers as well, in clear-view of the stuffing of bras. 3. We were instructed to apply the law, but not provided a copy of it. There are 50 different shoplifting laws in each state. D) A time stamp was not on the 3 video recordings. 1. Several minutes passed during the commission of the crime by the other 3 women. 2. It is not reasonable to assume a shocked young girl is going to a) even attempt to prevent her peer group instantly, from stealing. b) flee the store, Walmart, when she was driven their by them -thieves of no. E) the officer, "sees these all the time"; every person he arrests is automatically - guilty. We the jury had you do nothing more than, cause you to punish an person that was protecting themselves in best they could in a threatening situation. The Wrongfully Convicted - DID NOT MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO FACILITATE THIS CRIME.

Ways to improve chances of a fair trail - 1. Have the suspect stand closer to the jury than the officer. 2. A) Provide Internet access and B) a paper copy of all laws in the jury room under consideration. 3. A timer.

This was a brave young woman and I along with the system felled to protect her. The arresting officer needs to be retrained.

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel - The accused nor us the jury had no counsel.

For the typical criminal defendant who has no access to funds to pay for a private criminal defense attorney, the only source of representation with respect to their criminal charges is a public defender, or a court-appointed attorney. While there are many, many highly experienced, quality court-appointed lawyers, there are also some such attorneys who are inexperienced, underpaid, and overworked by the sheer number of criminal defense clients assigned to them. As a result, there are cases in which a criminal defendant receives ineffective or inadequate legal representation. While some such cases are overturned on appeal on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, a far greater number are upheld for a variety of reasons, even where the attorney’s behavior might appear inadequate, at best.

Police and/or Process Misconduct - The Officer misrepresented the 2 laws, we the jury were to apply.

Like all human beings, police officers and prosecuting attorneys sometimes make misjudgments and errors, and even commit misconduct that results in wrongful convictions. Just recently, a federal court of appeals overturned the conviction of a criminal defendant where the prosecutor had excluded all African - Americans from the jury on the basis of their race, despite the fact that the county population from which the jury was chosen was 55% African-American. The court concluded that the prosecutor had engaged in illegal race discrimination in that case. Other wrongful conviction cases have involved police misconduct, such as where a police officer has coerced a criminal defendant into making a false confession, or where a police officer has lied or exaggerated his testimony during a criminal trial.

Men Marry Character, Well Mannered Women, Not a Servant. Commit

To the idea of marriage or you won't want it when you have it, anyway. "when she talks I feel so good." "her outfit wasn't revealing." Women decide on a guy in 10 seconds, men on a woman in ten minutes. Women that provide ambition,inspiration, and confidence." Demand respect. In other words- women had have a high self esteem / self worth / since of purpose.  I have practices on  http://www.youtube.com/user/b29349 and improving boundaries at "inner game mind" Cleaning out and removing the old bad memories leaves only new good ones to be created. Peace. Love. Wisdom.