My question involves criminal law for State of South Carolina Walmart Shoplifting
Retrain Asset Protection and Correct. FALSE SHOPLIFTING, Everyday. young girl, did not attempt to be a "look out " for the other 3 female shop lifters at Wal-mart. This is what she did through my Thursday night Dream Casting - 1. She did what any innocent,shocked, startled person would do; Panicked. The same pattern erratic movements is what a mouse does in a maze when it doesn't know what to do. 2. She fled the group, but kept looking and returning to the group. B) She was Not being a "look out" for many reasons. 1.We the jury could not see her face or view her body language, but 2. Any basic threatening combat ( potentially threatening ) situation a "look out" would not kept a large bag on their shoulder restricting movement and speed. 3. Also, it would have been used to load more stolen items. 4. Several minutes had passed during the commission of this crime. C) under the hand of one hand of all - the officer would have had to 1. prove conspiracy - that the "Lookout" was reasonably going to benefit from the theft - materially or momentarily which did NOT display in the law or even attempt to do verbally, Showing Police malicious, misconduct by misrepresenting the law that we the jury were never allowed to see. 2. Under the instruction of the law the officer implied, He would have to had arrested the other passersby that stopped within a few feet of the 3 female robbers as well, in clear-view of the stuffing of bras. 3. We were instructed to apply the law, but not provided a copy of it. There are 50 different shoplifting laws in each state.D) A time stamp was not on the 3 video recordings. 1. Several minutes passed during the commission of the crime by the other 3 women. 2. It is not reasonable to assume a shocked young girl is going to a) even attempt to prevent her peer group instantly, from stealing. b) flee the store, Wal - mart, when she was driven their by them -thieves of no. E) the officer, "sees these all the time"; every person he arrests is automatically - guilty. We the jury had you do nothing more than, cause you to punish an person that was protecting themselves in best they could in a threatening situation. The Wrongfully Convicted - DID NOT MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO FACILITATE THIS CRIME.
Ways to improve chances of a fair trail - 1. Have the suspect stand closer to the jury than the officer. 2. A) Provide Internet access and B) a paper copy of all laws in the jury room under consideration. 3. A timer.
This was a brave young woman and I along with the system felled to protect her. The arresting officer needs to be retrained.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel - The accused, nor the jury had counsel.
attorney’s behavior might appear inadequate, at best.
Police and/or Process Misconduct - The Officer misrepresented the 2 laws, applied - shoplifting, "look out", hand of one is the hand of all.
police officer has lied or exaggerated his testimony during a criminal trial WHAT CAN BE DONE TO CORRECT THE CONVICTION? RETRIAL? APPEAL? EXPUNGE? RETRAIN POLICE? FINE WALMART - ASSET PROTECTION? CHANGE LAWS? COSTS?
Retrain Asset Protection and Correct. FALSE SHOPLIFTING, Everyday. young girl, did not attempt to be a "look out " for the other 3 female shop lifters at Wal-mart. This is what she did through my Thursday night Dream Casting - 1. She did what any innocent,shocked, startled person would do; Panicked. The same pattern erratic movements is what a mouse does in a maze when it doesn't know what to do. 2. She fled the group, but kept looking and returning to the group. B) She was Not being a "look out" for many reasons. 1.We the jury could not see her face or view her body language, but 2. Any basic threatening combat ( potentially threatening ) situation a "look out" would not kept a large bag on their shoulder restricting movement and speed. 3. Also, it would have been used to load more stolen items. 4. Several minutes had passed during the commission of this crime. C) under the hand of one hand of all - the officer would have had to 1. prove conspiracy - that the "Lookout" was reasonably going to benefit from the theft - materially or momentarily which did NOT display in the law or even attempt to do verbally, Showing Police malicious, misconduct by misrepresenting the law that we the jury were never allowed to see. 2. Under the instruction of the law the officer implied, He would have to had arrested the other passersby that stopped within a few feet of the 3 female robbers as well, in clear-view of the stuffing of bras. 3. We were instructed to apply the law, but not provided a copy of it. There are 50 different shoplifting laws in each state.D) A time stamp was not on the 3 video recordings. 1. Several minutes passed during the commission of the crime by the other 3 women. 2. It is not reasonable to assume a shocked young girl is going to a) even attempt to prevent her peer group instantly, from stealing. b) flee the store, Wal - mart, when she was driven their by them -thieves of no. E) the officer, "sees these all the time"; every person he arrests is automatically - guilty. We the jury had you do nothing more than, cause you to punish an person that was protecting themselves in best they could in a threatening situation. The Wrongfully Convicted - DID NOT MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO FACILITATE THIS CRIME.
Ways to improve chances of a fair trail - 1. Have the suspect stand closer to the jury than the officer. 2. A) Provide Internet access and B) a paper copy of all laws in the jury room under consideration. 3. A timer.
This was a brave young woman and I along with the system felled to protect her. The arresting officer needs to be retrained.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel - The accused, nor the jury had counsel.
attorney’s behavior might appear inadequate, at best.
Police and/or Process Misconduct - The Officer misrepresented the 2 laws, applied - shoplifting, "look out", hand of one is the hand of all.
police officer has lied or exaggerated his testimony during a criminal trial WHAT CAN BE DONE TO CORRECT THE CONVICTION? RETRIAL? APPEAL? EXPUNGE? RETRAIN POLICE? FINE WALMART - ASSET PROTECTION? CHANGE LAWS? COSTS?
No comments:
Post a Comment